In a recent live chat on Instagram, DJ Maphorisa stirred up quite a storm by claiming ownership of the masters for all songs recorded with his equipment.
According to the music producer, if a song is recorded in his studio with his lighting and tools, then it is owned by him. This statement has sparked a heated debate on social media, with users sharing their thoughts and opinions.
YOU MAY ALSO LIKE: Arthur Mafokate’s Luxury Guest House Remains Under Preservation Order
Phori is tired of you all pic.twitter.com/8B1G2vGEYl
— Man’s NOT Barry Roux 🔄 (@AdvoBarryRoux_) January 30, 2024
One Twitter user highlighted the fact that DJ Maphorisa’s house is reportedly filled with multiple studios, which undoubtedly adds to the allure and creativity of his music.
However, it also means that he asserts ownership over the intellectual property of any songs recorded in his various studios. While acknowledging DJ Maphorisa’s legendary status, the tweep emphasised the need for a better understanding of how the music industry operates.
Another user expressed a desire for a breakdown of ownership in the music industry, particularly when it comes to collaborations and features.
Who owns what? When does a song become a collaboration? These questions highlight the complexity of the music industry and the need for transparency and clarity.
DJ Maphorisa’s claim has certainly caused a stir, raising important questions about ownership and intellectual property in the music industry.
YOU MAY ALSO LIKE: Anele Mdoda’s Parking Machine Mishap And Tequila Troubles
While it is not uncommon for producers to have certain rights over the music they create, the extent of DJ Maphorisa’s claim has sparked a lively discussion among fans and industry insiders alike.
As the debate continues, it is clear that there is a need for more information and understanding about the intricacies of music ownership. Until then, we can only ponder the implications of DJ Maphorisa’s bold assertion and await further insights from those well-versed in the music industry.
