In the aftermath of the 2024 elections, Julius Malema, the leader of the Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF), underscored the necessity for introspection within his party.
Despite witnessing a steady growth in its earlier years, the EFF experienced a decline in its vote share, dropping from 10.8% in 2019 to 9.47% in 2024.
This downturn prompted Malema to advocate for a period of self-reflection to diagnose and rectify the underlying issues that contributed to this electoral performance.
Malema identified several factors that he believes led to the EFF’s reduced vote share. A significant portion of EFF’s previous support base shifted allegiance to Jacob Zuma’s newly established Umkhonto Wesizwe (MK) party.
The emergence of MK as a political entity resonated with some voters, thereby diluting the EFF’s traditional voter demographic. Additionally, Malema pointed to a negative media narrative that he argued had a detrimental impact on the party’s public image and electoral fortunes.
Speaking at the IEC’s national results operations centre in Midrand, Malema emphasized that the EFF has already initiated a thorough self-reflective process.
This internal review aims to scrutinize the party’s strategies, outreach efforts, and overall campaign effectiveness. By engaging in this comprehensive self-assessment, Malema hopes to uncover insights that will guide the EFF in addressing the challenges it faced during the 2024 elections and in devising more robust strategies for future electoral contests.
The EFF’s commitment to self-reflection is indicative of its resilience and willingness to adapt. By critically evaluating its performance and understanding the dynamics that influenced voter behaviour, the party seeks to realign its objectives and reconnect with its core supporters.
Malema’s call for introspection reflects a proactive approach to political leadership, aimed at not just identifying shortcomings but also leveraging them as opportunities for growth and improvement.
Despite facing an electoral setback in the 2024 elections, Julius Malema has made it clear that he has no intention of stepping down as the leader of the Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF).
In a public address, Malema reassured his followers that there is no sense of panic within the party. Instead, he emphasized his unwavering commitment to continue steering the EFF toward its objectives. This message of steadfastness is designed to bolster party morale and reaffirm the EFF’s long-term vision.
Malema articulated that the EFF is on a generational mission, differentiating it from what he termed ‘popcorn parties’—political entities that are transient and lack a sustained ideological foundation.
According to Malema, the EFF’s goals are deeply rooted in a broader historical context and are intended to bring about lasting change. This perspective aims to cultivate a sense of purpose and direction among party members, ensuring that their efforts are aligned with a larger vision.
The EFF leader also addressed concerns regarding his ability to lead amid potential political, health, or age-related challenges. Malema asserted that his leadership is unwavering and that he remains fully capable of fulfilling his responsibilities regardless of any such obstacles.
This declaration is aimed at dispelling any doubts about the party’s stability and continuity, ensuring that supporters remain confident in the EFF’s leadership structure.
By reaffirming his commitment to the EFF’s mission and highlighting the party’s resilience, Malema seeks to position the EFF as a steadfast and enduring force in South African politics.
His focus on long-term objectives and stability is intended to differentiate the EFF from other political entities, thereby reinforcing the party’s unique identity and strategic vision.
Julius Malema candidly addressed the electoral setbacks faced by the Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF) in the 2024 elections, attributing a significant portion of the decline to the emergence of the MK party.
The MK party, which has seen substantial growth, managed to outperform the EFF in key regions such as KwaZulu-Natal and Mpumalanga. This shift in voter dynamics marked a pivotal moment for the EFF, highlighting the fluidity of political allegiances in South Africa’s complex political landscape.
Malema elaborated on how the EFF had previously gained traction among supporters of former President Jacob Zuma, who had turned to the EFF after Zuma’s departure from the African National Congress (ANC). These voters, although crucial to the EFF’s earlier successes, were never fully committed to the party’s long-term objectives.
Malema emphasized that the EFF’s current state, devoid of these ‘borrowed’ votes, represents a more authentic and cohesive support base, aligning more closely with the party’s core principles and mission.
Furthermore, Malema criticized the actions of President Cyril Ramaphosa, suggesting that Ramaphosa’s approach inadvertently bolstered Zuma’s popularity. According to Malema, by making certain strategic errors, Ramaphosa effectively turned Zuma into a martyr in the eyes of many, inadvertently strengthening his support base.
This shift not only affected the ANC but also had a ripple effect, influencing the broader political terrain and voter sentiments.
Malema’s reflections offer a nuanced understanding of the EFF’s electoral performance and the broader political currents at play. By acknowledging the impact of the MK party’s rise and Zuma’s enduring influence, he provides a clear-eyed assessment of the challenges and opportunities that lie ahead for the EFF.
This evaluation underscores the importance of genuine voter alignment with the party’s goals, as the EFF continues to navigate the evolving political landscape in South Africa.
Looking ahead, Julius Malema has expressed an openness to coalition discussions, emphasizing that any potential collaboration must be initiated by other parties approaching the Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF).
This stance underscores the EFF’s strategic position, as they remain amenable to partnership talks but are not actively seeking alliances. In particular, Malema noted a willingness to collaborate with both the MK party and the African National Congress (ANC), signaling that there is no underlying animosity between these groups. This openness to coalition formation indicates a pragmatic approach to future political strategy.
However, Malema did not shy away from critiquing the ANC for its substantial loss of support in the recent elections. He firmly asserted that the ANC is the biggest loser, experiencing a more considerable decline compared to other parties.
Malema dismissed attempts by some to shift the narrative of electoral loss onto the EFF, pointing out that the ANC’s decline is evidently more significant and noteworthy. This critique highlights the EFF’s position as a critical observer of the ANC’s performance, leveraging the situation to underscore their own relative stability and potential for growth.
 face a period of introspection due to a decline in vote share.){kind=link}