Renowned author Jackie Phamotse has found herself in hot water after making defamatory comments about socialite couple Basetsana and Romeo Kumalo.
On Tuesday, the Randburg Magistrate’s Court convicted Phamotse of criminal defamation, crimen injuria, and contempt of court for her comments, which were posted on Twitter and featured in her book ‘I Tweet What I Like… So Sue Me’.
YOU MAY ALSO LIKE: Jackie Phamotse Found Guilty In Basetsana Kumalo Defamation Case
The Charges
Last September, Phamotse found herself in legal hot water due to comments she made on Twitter and in her book, provocatively titled “I Tweet What I Like… So Sue Me.” These comments implicated socialite couple Basetsana and Romeo Kumalo in a baseless sex tape scandal. The fallout was swift, and the Kumalos’ lives were irrevocably changed.
The Verdict
Magistrate Saras Naidoo, with a stern gaze and a measured tone, delivered the sentence. Phamotse will serve two years of house arrest – a period during which her movements will be restricted to her home. But that’s not all. She’s also been slapped with a fine of R30,000 or the alternative of 10 months in prison.
Community Service and Reflection
During her house arrest, Phamotse won’t be idle. She’ll perform 16 hours of community service each month, contributing to society in a different way. Perhaps this time will allow her to reflect on her actions and the impact they’ve had on others.
No Remorse
The magistrate didn’t mince words. She found that Phamotse had shown no remorse for her defamatory statements. The Kumalos, once untouchable, now bear the scars of baseless accusations. Their reputation was tarnished and their lives were forever altered.
A First-Time Offender
While direct imprisonment wasn’t deemed appropriate, the court acknowledged that Phamotse is a first-time offender. Had her track record been different, the outcome might have been harsher.
YOU MAY ALSO LIKE: Basetsana And Romeo Kumalo Can’t Wait To See Jackie Phamotse Wear Orange Overalls
A Voice for the Voiceless
Phamotse’s lawyer pleaded for leniency, emphasizing her role as a gender-based violence activist. Society, he argued, needs her more than prison does. Her voice, even when flawed, speaks for the voiceless.
In Conclusion
As the courtroom doors close behind her, Jackie Phamotse faces a new reality. House arrest, fines, and community service – a far cry from the Twitterverse where she once held sway. Perhaps this chapter will teach her that words have consequences, and the path to redemption lies in actions, not tweets.
