Gauteng Health Department Pays R220 Million For RAF Claims

The Department of Health in Gauteng has paid R220 million to a company to do the investigative and administrative work to claim from the Road Accident Fund (RAF) over past three years.

Gauteng Health Department Pays R220 Million For RAF Claims-SurgeZirc SA
The Acting Gauteng Health MEC, Jacob Mamabolo/ Photo File: EWN

The Department of Health in Gauteng has paid R220 million to a company to do the investigative and administrative work to claim from the Road Accident Fund (RAF) over past three years.

The Acting Gauteng Health MEC Jacob Mamabolo has revealed in a written reply to my questions in the Gauteng Legislature.

READ MORE: DA Shocked Over Schools Vandalism Cases With Low Rate Of Arrest

According to Mamabolo, Batsumi Claims Management Solutions was paid R220 million and collected R524 million from the RAF. This amounts to an exorbitant 42% collection fee as the Department only received R304 million of the RAF money.

However, he said that the Gauteng Health Department has outsourced the collection of accident information because of its legal nature and lack of internal capacity to collect information.
In addition, to get accident reports from the South African Police Services and Metro police.

It was revealed that Batsumi has had a contract with the Department since 2006, initially through an open tender but the second award for this contract was through participation of the Free State Department of Health tender (DOH (FS) 126/16/17) in terms of Section 16.A6.5 of Treasury Regulations.

Mamabolo claims that there is value for money in this contract as it has enabled the department to meet its annual revenue targets.

READ MORE: DA In Gauteng Calls On MEC Mazibuko To Ensure Safety Of GBV Victims

The DA find it suspicious that an open tender process was not followed for Batsumi’s second contract but instead piggybacks on a tender from another province.

Premier David Makhura praises the open tender system, but there are far too many examples where it is bypassed, as in this 14-year contractual relationship that should have been reviewed long ago.

There are lots of these long-term cosy contracts either because of inefficiency or corruption.

 

Share this article with friends
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments